I began the journey, the odyssey, of reading “The Name of the Rose” by Umberto Eco on January 21st.
I purchased an “Everyman’s Library” edition with a gift card given to me by my Little League football team at our banquet last Saturday night.
Two things struck me as challenging as I read the Introduction, written by a certain David Lodge. It reads -
“It is recommended that first time readers of … do not read the introduction beyond the break on p. xiv until they have finished the novel.”
This footnote is a challenge - to read the book in order to return and read the rest of the Introduction. Right, this guy is so presumptuous that he is implying that his introduction is as important and majestic as the novel. Alternatively, it is also a temptation, of which I usually find difficult to avoid.
Secondly, in the last paragraph of this virginal part of the introduction, Mr. Lodge discusses the challenges most readers face within the first 100 pages, of which friends and editors of Eco’s recommend he shorten because they were “very difficult and demanding.”
Eco refuses, explaining that the pages were a “penance or initiation,” and those readers who were successful would “learn how to read the book, and would not be able to stop reading, having reached this point.”
One additional aspect of both Eco and the novel is that in some perverted way they intrigue me with the utter Catholicism of it all. Perhaps the what and why of the intrigue will be revealed in later discussion.
I intend these entries - T.N.o.t.R., Pt.x, etc. - to be a sort of commentary of my thoughts and ideas as I read this book. If anyone has comments, or has themselves read the book, please provide feedback and commentary as I go along. It is my intent to read, and thereby post every day until I have completed the novel.